administrative advocacy

Why Red States?

Why Red States?

To succeed in red states, there are two core principles to keep in mind: 

  1. We must take seriously the amount of time, resources, and expertise required to beat back attacks on SNAP that are rooted in racism, classism, and misogyny. Advocates must be able to coordinate and sustain high-quality policymaker education, community and media engagement, and strategic coalition-building. 

  2. Defeat is not inevitable. No matter how big of a veto-proof majority a legislature may have or how many favors the bill sponsor can cash in, attacks on SNAP built upon misinformation and stereotypes about low-income people can be beaten. Just ask the savvy advocates in states like Alabama, Kentucky, Montana, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Ohio – all of whom have recently successfully stopped harmful SNAP legislation from becoming law.

Why Administrative Advocacy?

Why Administrative Advocacy?

At Rachel Cahill Consulting (RCC), my team and I support and train state-level anti-hunger advocates to make the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) the most accessible and equitable program it can be in every community. While we support both legislative and administrative advocacy campaigns, for most of the year our focus is administrative advocacy. Here’s why.  


First, some definitions. Administrative advocacy is any effort to improve government policies or practices by directly or indirectly engaging with agency decision-makers outside of the legislative process. The core goal of administrative advocacy is to improve the implementation of existing policies and programs. Because what’s the point of great policy if it doesn’t get implemented well - or at all - in the real world?